Default
Score model

Pick how composites are weighted for you. Affects every score across the app.

Sign in to save models →
Sign in

USA OPPORTUNITY INCOME FUND, INC.

Sponsored by USA Opportunity Income·

Unknown· Debt· Inc · 2 classes· ● Low· PPM v1· Updated 26d ago
2 data notes
Unusual structureUnscored: absolute lp take
Run the numbers
Composite
46.3
median 36 +10
Pref Return
median 8.0% · Diversified Real Estate
LP Take (Base)
median 85.9% · Diversified Real Estate
GP Commit
0.0%
median 0.0% +0.0%
Min Investment
$1K
ticket size
Offering Size
$75M
target raise
Cascade · Distributions

Where each dollar goes

$875K
LP $875K · Fees $0 · GP $0
GROSS PROCEEDS$875KLPT1Return of Capital$500,000 · 57.1% of grossLPGPT4Residual Split (100% / 0%) · 42.9%Limited Partners · $375KGeneral Partner · $0pool fully distributed
Standard scenario · $500K equity · 5y hold · 1.75× exitRun your own cascade →
Class structure · 2 classes

How USA OPPORTUNITY INCOME FUND, INC. divides the cap table

The cascade above models the blended LP view. Click a class below to view per-class economics.

Deal diligence10 findings · worst high

Automated checks across the fund's extracted PPM. Every finding is shown with the evidence it's based on — proven numbers or a verbatim quote and page.

Document quality

Drafting defects found in the PPM prose — numeric inconsistencies, broken cross-references, unfilled placeholders, and defined-term problems. Each is shown with the offending quote and its page.

Numeric inconsistency — Lender advances as of November 2, 2021

High

The same 'as of November 2, 2021' Lender-advances total is stated as $64,787 in the offering summary, Use of Proceeds, Liquidity, Related-Party sections and the financial-statement notes, but as $54,787 in the risk factor on page 30.

As of November 2, 2021, advances to the Company by the Lender totaled $64,787. ... As of November 2, 2021, advances to the Company by the Lender totaled $54,787.
PPM p.1895% confidence

Document-quality defect — Issuer name in Index to Financial Statements header

Low

The Index to Financial Statements header reads 'USA REAL ESTATE OPPORTUNITIES INCOME, INC.', which does not match the issuer's actual name 'USA Opportunity Income Fund, Inc.' used throughout the offering circular and on the signature page.

USA REAL ESTATE OPPORTUNITIES INCOME, INC.
PPM p.10485% confidence

Diligence gaps

Questions a standard diligence questionnaire would ask that the PPM leaves unanswered.

DDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ readiness

How much of a standard institutional due-diligence questionnaire this fund's offering documents answer out of the box. Gaps are questions an allocator will ask directly.

38%
Coverage
5 answered0 partial8 gaps13 questions
Economics
  • What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?Gap
  • What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?Gap
  • Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?Gap
  • Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?Gap
  • What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?Gap
Structure
  • What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?Gap
  • What is the fund's investment strategy / asset class?Debt · UnknownAnswered
  • What is the fund's vintage year?Vintage 2021.Answered
  • What is the target offering size?Target offering of $75,000,000.Answered
  • What is the minimum LP investment?Minimum investment of $1,000.Answered
Fees & Expenses
  • Is the fund's fee schedule disclosed (management fee, etc.)?6 fee line item(s) extracted from the offering documents.Answered
Governance
  • Does the fund engage an independent auditor?Gap
  • Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?Gap

Fee scheduletaken before LP distributions

Total load 8.00%
Fee
Trigger
Basis
Rate
Selling Commission
Bond sales
Up to 5.00% of gross offering proceeds paid to Coastal Equities Inc. and selling group broker-dealers
5.00%
Managing Broker-Dealer Fee
Bond sales
1.00% of gross offering proceeds
1.00%
Wholesaling Fee
Bond sales
Up to 0.75% of gross offering proceeds (rounded to whole number: actual is 0.75%)
1.00%
Due Diligence and Marketing Expense Reimbursement
Bond sales
Non-accountable allowance of up to 1.00% of gross offering proceeds
1.00%
Technology Platform Fee
Platform usage during offering
Flat fees: $5,000 one-time signing setup; $5,000 one-time platform launch setup; $1,250/month ongoing platform fee; $15 per electronic signature; $15 per payment reconciled
0.00%
Transfer Agent Fee
Ongoing administration
Flat fees: $2,000 initial setup + first closing; $500 per additional closing; $600/month DTC CUSIP bond maintenance; $600/month Non-DTC CUSIP bond maintenance; $125 per DWAC service instance
0.00%

Service providers3 gaps

Legal Counsel
Gap
Not disclosed
No independent counsel named for investors. Common in small syndications where Manager and Fund share counsel — reduces independence. Verify during diligence.
Auditor
Gap
Not disclosed
Audit intent not stated in PPM. Ask the sponsor: will the fund be audited, by whom, and on what frequency?
Fund Administrator
Gap
Not disclosed
No third-party fund administrator referenced. Manager likely handles admin internally — common for <$10M raises but reduces independence.
Placement Agent
OK
No placement agent engaged
No placement agent engaged. Direct placement by Manager — no placement fees eat your invested capital.

Community threads0 active

What allocators are saying. Diligence notes, open questions, attached scenarios.

No threads yet. Be the first →

Reviews

No reviews yet

Be the first allocator to leave a take.

Funds you might also likesame Unknown