Default
Score model

Pick how composites are weighted for you. Affects every score across the app.

Sign in to save models →
Sign in
RMR

Red Mountain Resort

1 fund·$8M raised◔ Unclaimed
⇪ Compare funds💬 Discuss
Avg Composite
45.0
Mid pack
Active funds
1
of 1 vintage
Total raised
$8M
disclosed offerings
Followers
0
not followed yet
Are you Red Mountain Resort? Claim this profile.

Add a verified bio, correct extracted data, publish updates, respond to community questions. Free for sponsors.

Composite score · by vintage

1 scored fund · avg 45.0
2550752017Red Mountain Ventures Limited Partnership · vintage 2017 · 45.0
Top quartile Middle Lower Sponsor avg

Disclosures & prior history7 disclosures · worst high

Material items extracted from the risk-factor, conflicts, and prior-performance sections of Red Mountain Resort's PPMs. Each is quoted verbatim with its source page — surfaced, not editorialized.

Adverse prior-fund performance disclosed — Recurring net losses and accumulated deficit

High

The Partnership has an accumulated deficit of $28,597,384 as of April 30, 2017, and has reported net losses of $3,880,346 and $3,314,500 for fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively, driven primarily by interest expense on convertible debt. Total partnership interest (net equity) is negative at $(7,039,540).

Net loss for fiscal 2017, was $3,880,346, a 17% increase compared to $3,314,500 for fiscal 2016. The increased loss is primarily attributable to interest expense, the majority of which were accrued.
PPM p.2295% confidence

Related-party conflict disclosed — Jeff Busby (Director) - Loan conversion to Class C and C2 Units

High

Jeff Busby, a director of the General Partner, and the Juice Trust (which he controls as trustee and which benefits his children) converted CDN$21,385,349 in loans owed by RMR to themselves into 2,413,696 Class C Units and 2,413,696 Class C2 Units in July 2017, immediately prior to the Class D offering. This gives Busby-controlled entities approximately 90.25% of both Class C and Class C2 Units, which sit just behind Class D in the distribution waterfall but ahead of Class B and A in return of capital.

In July 2017, the Juice Trust and Jeff Busby, lenders to RMR, converted an aggregate of CDN$21,385,349 in loans owed by RMR into 2,413,696 Class C Units and 2,413,696 Class C2 Units. Jeff Busby, a director of the General Partner, is the trustee of the Juice Trust, which owns 63.1% of the voting shares of Powder Corporation. The sole beneficiary of the Juice Trust is the Busby Children's Trust, all of the beneficiaries of which are the children of Jeff Busby, and the trustee of which is Jeff Busby.
PPM p.2995% confidence

Related-party conflict disclosed — Value Powder Corporation / Juice Trust - Dominant unit holder concentration

High

Value Powder Corporation, controlled by the Juice Trust (trustee: Jeff Busby, director), holds 81.72% of Class B Units, 90.25% of Class C Units, and 90.25% of Class C2 Units as of August 1, 2017. This extreme concentration means a single director-affiliated entity dominates the senior unit classes above Class D in the distribution waterfall.

Value Powder Corporation. Jeff Busby, a director of the General Partner, is the trustee of the Juice Trust which owns directly or indirectly 63.1% of the voting shares of Value Powder Corporation. The sole beneficiary of the Juice Trust is the Busby Children's Trust, all of the beneficiaries of which are the children of Jeff Busby, and the trustee of which is Jeff Busby.
PPM p.2990% confidence

Key-person history disclosed — Going concern risk disclosed in financial statement notes

Medium

Management disclosed in the financial statement notes that while projected cash flows are expected to cover obligations for 12 months, management cannot provide assurances the Partnership will be successful in its capital-raising plans, and unforeseen circumstances may require immediate additional capital raising.

However, management cannot provide any assurances that the Partnership will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans. Management also cannot provide any assurance that unforeseen circumstances that could occur at any time within the next twelve months or thereafter will not increase the need for the Partnership to raise additional capital on an immediate basis.
PPM p.4890% confidence

Related-party conflict disclosed — Class D Unit holders excluded from voting and governance

Medium

Investors purchasing Class D Units have no voting rights except on amendments that adversely affect them. They have no right to nominate directors of the General Partner. Key decisions including dissolution, asset sales, and Partnership Agreement amendments are controlled exclusively by Class A, B, and C unit holders, all of which are insider-affiliated.

The holders of Class A Units, Class B Units, Class C Units and Class C2 Units, are entitled to cast one vote for each Unit held. The Class D Units have no voting rights, except for voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement that adversely affect the rights of the holders of Class D Units.
PPM p.3090% confidence

Related-party conflict disclosed — Jeff Busby (Director) - Related party loan to RMR

Medium

Jeff Busby, a director of the General Partner, made a short-term unsecured book-entry loan of CDN$500,000 to RMR (the operating subsidiary) in July 2017 at 6% interest, creating an additional related-party creditor relationship between a director and the fund.

a short term loan in the amount of CDN$500,000 was made to RMR on approximately July 7, 2017 by Jeff Busby, a director of the General Partner. The loan is book-entry only, unsecured and bears interest at 6% per annum, compounded annually.
PPM p.2590% confidence

Litigation disclosed — Lawsuits as plaintiff - Grey Mountain Chairlift and retaining wall construction defect

Low

The Partnership is a plaintiff in two lawsuits: (1) against the manufacturer and installers of the Grey Mountain Chairlift for alleged faulty engineering and installation requiring significant reconstruction in 2015, and (2) against a contractor and others for a construction defect in a retaining wall. Management does not view either as material.

The Partnership is involved in two lawsuits as plaintiffs. In the first lawsuit, the Partnership filed claims against the manufacturer of the Grey Mountain Chairlift and certain parties involved in the installation of the chairlift, for alleged faulty engineering and installation that required significant reconstruction and repairs in 2015. The Partnership also has filed a construction defect lawsuit against the contractor and certain other parties involved in constructing a retaining wall on the property. Management of the Partnership does no view either of these lawsuits as material to the Partnership's business, financial condition or operating results.
PPM p.5690% confidence

Fund portfolio

Community threads0 active

What allocators are saying. Diligence notes, open questions, attached scenarios.

No threads yet. Be the first →

Reviews

No reviews yet

Be the first allocator to leave a take.