Default
Score model

Pick how composites are weighted for you. Affects every score across the app.

Sign in to save models →
Sign in

YSMD, LLC

Sponsored by Collab·

Unknown· Debt· LLC · 1 class· ● Low· PPM v1· Updated 26d ago
2 data notes
Unusual structureUnusual structure
Run the numbers
Composite
42.1
median 35 +7
Pref Return
LP Take (Base)
70.9%
median 42.6% +28.3%
GP Commit
0.0%
median 0.0% +0.0%
Min Investment
$500
ticket size
Offering Size
$5M
target raise
Cascade · Distributions

Where each dollar goes

$875K
LP $650K · Fees $225K · GP $0
GROSS PROCEEDS$875KGPFFees to Manager$225,000 · 25.7% of grossLPT1Return of Capital$500,000 · 57.1% of grossLPGPT4Residual Split (100% / 0%) · 17.1%Limited Partners · $150KGeneral Partner · $0pool fully distributed
Standard scenario · $500K equity · 5y hold · 1.75× exitRun your own cascade →

Deal diligence24 findings · worst high

Automated checks across the fund's extracted PPM. Every finding is shown with the evidence it's based on — proven numbers or a verbatim quote and page.

Waterfall structure

Structural checks run against YSMD, LLC's extracted waterfall. Each is a deterministic test — the numbers shown are proven from the PPM, not estimated.

Disposition Fee (2%) is taken above the waterfall

Medium

A performance- or transaction-linked fee paid above the waterfall reaches the GP before the LP's distribution priorities run, eroding the pool the pref + return-of-capital draw from. Routine asset-management fees above the line are normal; a disposition/promote-flavored fee there is a leak worth pricing.

Disposition Fees: Upon the disposition and sale of a Series Property, each Series will be charged a disposition fee equal to 2% of the disposition price.
PPM p.985% confidence

Document quality

Drafting defects found in the PPM prose — numeric inconsistencies, broken cross-references, unfilled placeholders, and defined-term problems. Each is shown with the offending quote and its page.

Document-quality defect — Operating Agreement forum (California vs Delaware)

Medium

The Operating Agreement forum selection is stated as the State of Delaware in the Risk Factors / Forum sections but as the State of California in the Securities Being Offered section, a direct contradiction over the governing forum.

be brought in state or federal court of competent jurisdiction located within the State of Delaware. ||| thereby, excluding matters arising under the federal securities laws, be brought in state or federal court of competent jurisdiction located within the State of California.
PPM p.2485% confidence

Numeric inconsistency — Maximum Series Interests (902,924 vs 902,925)

Medium

Maximum Series A Interests stated as 902,924 in the Series Offering Table but as 902,925 (=100% to be owned) in the Security Ownership table.

$ 4,514,621 902,924 ||| Series A 902,925 100 %
PPM p.4085% confidence

Numeric inconsistency — Offering-expense reimbursement cap (3% of gross proceeds vs 3% of asset value)

Medium

The Managing Member offering-expense reimbursement is capped at 3% of gross proceeds in the cover/summary but at 3% of asset value in the Use of Proceeds footnote, two different bases.

for Series offering expenses actually incurred in an amount up to 3% of gross proceeds, which we expect to allocate among all ||| expenses actually incurred in an amount up to 3% of asset value, which we expect to allocate among all Series, including those created
PPM p.180% confidence

Unfilled placeholder text — [X]

Medium

Series Offering Table ships unfilled [X] placeholder tokens in place of the Series A Initial Qualification Date and Open/Closing Date columns.

Series A* 1742 Spruce Street, Berkeley, CA 94709 $5.00 100 Units ($500) $ 4,514,621 902,924 [X] [X] Pending
PPM p.495% confidence

Defined-term defect — Managing Manager

Low

The defined party 'Managing Member' is twice rendered as the non-existent term 'Managing Manager', creating ambiguity about the acting party.

address for Collab, our Managing Manager, is set forth on the cover page of this Offering Circular.
PPM p.4085% confidence

Document-quality defect — limited liability corporation

Low

The signature block describes Collab (USA) Capital LLC as 'a limited liability corporation', conflating LLC with corporation (Collab is described as an LLC / limited liability company elsewhere).

Collab (USA) Capital LLC, a limited liability corporation
PPM p.7870% confidence

Document-quality defect — Liquidation waterfall list labels (c)/(d)

Low

The liquidation distribution waterfall in Securities Being Offered is mislabeled '(c) First' and '(d) Second', restarting list lettering instead of '(a)/(b)' as used for the identical waterfall in the Summary.

(c) First, 100% to the Members (pro rata and which, for the avoidance of doubt, may include the Managing
PPM p.4570% confidence

Numeric inconsistency — Mortgage amount ($3.965,000 vs $3,965,000)

Low

The Spruce Street mortgage loan amount is mis-punctuated as $3.965,000 (decimal point) while it is $3,965,000 everywhere else in the document.

Street entered into a 5/1 adjustable interest rate mortgage loan with First Foundation Bank in the amount of $3.965,000 and secured by
PPM p.3085% confidence

Numeric inconsistency — Six-month 2022 depreciation ($81,463 vs $81,643)

Low

Spruce Street six-months-2022 depreciation is $81,463 in the Statement of Operations and pro forma but is stated as $81,643 in Note 3 narrative, a digit transposition.

Depreciation expenses totaled $81,643 and $81,369 for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021
PPM p.7580% confidence

Numeric inconsistency — Sourcing fee basis (asset price vs contractual purchase price)

Low

Note 4 of the audited YSMD financial statements bases the 5% sourcing fee on the 'asset price', while the body of the offering circular and the unaudited note base it on the 'contractual purchase price'.

each Series will pay to the Manager a sourcing fee up to 5% of the asset price of the relevant property acquired by the Series.
PPM p.5265% confidence

Unfilled placeholder text — [*]

Low

Exhibit Index ships unfilled [*] date placeholders for the Purchase and Sale Agreement and the Property Management Agreement, indicating undated/unfinished exhibits.

Form of Purchase and Sale Agreement dated [*], 2022, between YSMC, LLC and YSMD Series A, a series of YSMD, LLC
PPM p.7790% confidence

Document-quality defect — ASU 2016-02 mis-dated/mis-cited (2019)

Info

The Spruce Street recent-pronouncements note dates ASU No. 2016-02 to 'February 2019' and then refers to the non-existent 'ASU 2019-02', whereas the audited note correctly states February 2016.

In February 2019, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, that requires organizations that lease assets
PPM p.7570% confidence

Spelling / typo — Accrued epxenses

Info

Misspelling 'Accrued epxenses' (transposed letters in 'expenses') as a line item in the Spruce Street statement of cash flows.

Accrued epxenses
PPM p.6585% confidence

Spelling / typo — In the future, Here,

Info

Garbled sentence fragment 'In the future, Here, any officers or directors' in the Conflicts of Interest section.

some of which could compete with us. In the future, Here, any officers or directors
PPM p.4075% confidence

Spelling / typo — is initially is

Info

Doubled-word grammatical error 'who is initially is our Managing Member' in the Property Management Fees description.

a property management fee to the Property Manager, who is initially is our
PPM p.875% confidence

Spelling / typo — Managing Member anager

Info

Broken/garbled phrase 'Managing Member anager' in the related-party Loans disclosure (apparent merge of 'Managing Member' and 'Manager').

Managing Member anager and/or its affiliates may receive compensation from the company for providing loans, including, but not limited
PPM p.4180% confidence

Diligence gaps

Questions a standard diligence questionnaire would ask that the PPM leaves unanswered.

DDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ readiness

How much of a standard institutional due-diligence questionnaire this fund's offering documents answer out of the box. Gaps are questions an allocator will ask directly.

38%
Coverage
5 answered1 partial7 gaps13 questions
Economics
  • What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?Gap
  • What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?Gap
  • Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?Gap
  • Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?Gap
  • What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?Gap
Structure
  • What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?2 distribution tier(s) extracted; structure type not classified.Partial
  • What is the fund's investment strategy / asset class?Debt · UnknownAnswered
  • What is the fund's vintage year?Vintage 2022.Answered
  • What is the target offering size?Target offering of $4,514,621.Answered
  • What is the minimum LP investment?Minimum investment of $500.Answered
Fees & Expenses
  • Is the fund's fee schedule disclosed (management fee, etc.)?9 fee line item(s) extracted from the offering documents.Answered
Governance
  • Does the fund engage an independent auditor?Gap
  • Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?Gap

Fee scheduletaken before LP distributions

Total load 26.50%
Fee
Trigger
Basis
Rate
Monthly, from rental operations
Gross Receipts of the Series
8.00%
Quarterly
Asset Value of the Series, charged quarterly at 0.5% per quarter (2% annualized)
2.00%
Sourcing Fee
At acquisition / offering
Contractual purchase price of the relevant property; up to 5% of purchase price. For Series A: $225,000 (5% of $4,514,621 gross proceeds)
5.00%
Upon sale/disposition of a Series property
Disposition (sale) price of the Series Property
2.00%
Renovation Management Fee
When capital improvements are made to a Series property
Total capital improvement costs for renovation management
5.50%
Selling Commission (Broker-Dealer Fee)
Per closing / subscription
Amount raised in the offering (newly invested funds after FINRA No Objection Letter)
1.00%
Offering Expense Reimbursement
From offering proceeds
Gross proceeds of each Series; reimbursed to Managing Member for offering expenses actually incurred
3.00%
Dalmore Consulting Fee
Within 30 days after SEC qualification and FINRA No Objection Letter
One-time flat fee of $20,000 for general consulting services relating to the offering
0.00%
Dalmore Expense Allowance
At engagement
One-time flat fee of $5,000 advance expense allowance
0.00%

Service providers3 gaps

Legal Counsel
Gap
Not disclosed
No independent counsel named for investors. Common in small syndications where Manager and Fund share counsel — reduces independence. Verify during diligence.
Auditor
Gap
Not disclosed
Audit intent not stated in PPM. Ask the sponsor: will the fund be audited, by whom, and on what frequency?
Fund Administrator
Gap
Not disclosed
No third-party fund administrator referenced. Manager likely handles admin internally — common for <$10M raises but reduces independence.
Placement Agent
OK
No placement agent engaged
No placement agent engaged. Direct placement by Manager — no placement fees eat your invested capital.

Community threads0 active

What allocators are saying. Diligence notes, open questions, attached scenarios.

No threads yet. Be the first →

Reviews

No reviews yet

Be the first allocator to leave a take.

Funds you might also likesame Unknown