Default
Score model

Pick how composites are weighted for you. Affects every score across the app.

Sign in to save models →
Sign in

Roots Real Estate Exchange I, LLC

Sponsored by Roots·

Unknown· LLC · 1 class· ● Low· PPM v1· Updated 26d ago
2 data notes
Unusual structureUnscored: absolute lp take
Run the numbers
Composite
8.0
median 36 28
Pref Return
median 8.0% · Diversified Real Estate
LP Take (Base)
median 85.9% · Diversified Real Estate
GP Commit
0.0%
median 0.0% +0.0%
Min Investment
$100
ticket size
Offering Size
$75M
target raise
Cascade · Distributions

Where each dollar goes

$875K
LP $584K · Fees $291K · GP $0
GROSS PROCEEDS$875KGPFFees to Manager$291,250 · 33.3% of grossLPT1Return of Capital$500,000 · 57.1% of grossLPGPT4Residual Split (100% / 0%) · 9.6%Limited Partners · $84KGeneral Partner · $0pool fully distributed
Standard scenario · $500K equity · 5y hold · 1.75× exitRun your own cascade →

Deal diligence16 findings · worst high

Automated checks across the fund's extracted PPM. Every finding is shown with the evidence it's based on — proven numbers or a verbatim quote and page.

Waterfall structure

Structural checks run against Roots Real Estate Exchange I, LLC's extracted waterfall. Each is a deterministic test — the numbers shown are proven from the PPM, not estimated.

Disposition Fee (3%) is taken above the waterfall

Medium

A performance- or transaction-linked fee paid above the waterfall reaches the GP before the LP's distribution priorities run, eroding the pool the pref + return-of-capital draw from. Routine asset-management fees above the line are normal; a disposition/promote-flavored fee there is a leak worth pricing.

We will pay the Manager a one-time 3% disposition fee, per disposition, which will be calculated on the final disposition value when a property is sold, utilized in a 1031 exchange, or otherwise disposed of by the Manager on behalf of the Company, which will be paid at or shortly after closing on the property.
PPM p.1385% confidence

Document quality

Drafting defects found in the PPM prose — numeric inconsistencies, broken cross-references, unfilled placeholders, and defined-term problems. Each is shown with the offending quote and its page.

Unfilled placeholder text — [__________], 2028

Medium

Same offering-termination date left as an unfilled placeholder a second time in the body.

expect to offer the Units in this offering until the earlier of [__________], 2028, which is three years from the qualification
PPM p.1385% confidence

Unfilled placeholder text — [_____], 2028

Medium

Offering-termination date shipped as an unfilled placeholder in the summary body text.

We expect to offer the Units in this offering until the earlier of [_____], 2028, which is three years from the initial qualification date of this offering,
PPM p.485% confidence

Broken cross-reference — Termination and Dissolution clause (1)-(2)-(4)

Low

Enumerated dissolution-triggers list skips item (3), jumping from (2) directly to (4).

We will dissolve upon: (1) the election of our Manager to dissolve us with approval of holder of at least a majority of the Units; (2) the entry of a decree of judicial dissolution of the Company; or (4) at any time that we no longer have any Members, unless our business is continued in accordance with the Georgia LLC Act.
PPM p.8895% confidence

Document-quality defect — Atlanta, GA 3344

Low

Property address shows a truncated four-digit ZIP code (Atlanta ZIPs are five digits, 303xx).

Semmes Street Atlanta, GA 3344
PPM p.7465% confidence

Numeric inconsistency — Current Market Value: $450,00

Low

Property Current Market Value figure is truncated to '$450,00' (missing a digit) where the parallel Roots purchase price is the full '$300,000'.

Price by Roots: $300,000 Current Market Value: $450,00
PPM p.6460% confidence

Unfilled placeholder text — File No. [___]

Low

SEC file number left as an unfilled template token on the cover page.

Preliminary Offering Circular File No. [___]
PPM p.180% confidence

Spelling / typo — the Company unable to raise

Info

Broken sentence missing the verb 'is' ('If the Company [is] unable to raise substantial funds').

the Company unable to raise substantial funds during the offering, it will make fewer investments resulting in less diversification in
PPM p.5070% confidence

Diligence gaps

Questions a standard diligence questionnaire would ask that the PPM leaves unanswered.

DDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ readiness

How much of a standard institutional due-diligence questionnaire this fund's offering documents answer out of the box. Gaps are questions an allocator will ask directly.

38%
Coverage
5 answered0 partial8 gaps13 questions
Economics
  • What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?Gap
  • What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?Gap
  • Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?Gap
  • Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?Gap
  • What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?Gap
Structure
  • What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?Gap
  • What is the fund's investment strategy / asset class?UnknownAnswered
  • What is the fund's vintage year?Vintage 2010.Answered
  • What is the target offering size?Target offering of $75,000,000.Answered
  • What is the minimum LP investment?Minimum investment of $100.Answered
Fees & Expenses
  • Is the fund's fee schedule disclosed (management fee, etc.)?5 fee line item(s) extracted from the offering documents.Answered
Governance
  • Does the fund engage an independent auditor?Gap
  • Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?Gap

Fee scheduletaken before LP distributions

Total load 16.00%
Fee
Trigger
Basis
Rate
At or shortly after initial closing on each property
Initial purchase price of each property
3.00%
Monthly
10% of all revenue generated by the Company for each month (including rent collected)
10.00%
At or shortly after closing on each disposition
Final disposition value when a property is sold, used in a 1031 exchange, or otherwise disposed of
3.00%
Maintenance and Repair Reserve
Monthly
Fixed dollar amount per month per property, set at time of acquisition based on condition and anticipated needs; maximum the Company pays for repairs — any costs above this fee are paid by the Manager
0.00%
Organization and Offering Expense Reimbursement
Ongoing offering period
Actual third-party organization and offering costs incurred by Manager on Company's behalf; estimated up to $2,250,000
0.00%

Service providers3 gaps

Legal Counsel
Gap
Not disclosed
No independent counsel named for investors. Common in small syndications where Manager and Fund share counsel — reduces independence. Verify during diligence.
Auditor
Gap
Not disclosed
Audit intent not stated in PPM. Ask the sponsor: will the fund be audited, by whom, and on what frequency?
Fund Administrator
Gap
Not disclosed
No third-party fund administrator referenced. Manager likely handles admin internally — common for <$10M raises but reduces independence.
Placement Agent
OK
No placement agent engaged
No placement agent engaged. Direct placement by Manager — no placement fees eat your invested capital.

Community threads0 active

What allocators are saying. Diligence notes, open questions, attached scenarios.

No threads yet. Be the first →

Reviews

No reviews yet

Be the first allocator to leave a take.

Funds you might also likesame Unknown