Default
Score model

Pick how composites are weighted for you. Affects every score across the app.

Sign in to save models →
Sign in

Groundfloor Loans 2 LLC

Sponsored by Groundfloor Finance·

Unknown· LLC · 1 class· ● Low· PPM v1· Updated 26d ago
3 data notes
Unusual structureLow-confidence extractionUnscored: absolute lp take
Run the numbers
Composite
35.6
median 53 17
Pref Return
median 9.0% · Real Estate Debt / Mortgage Funds
LP Take (Base)
median 88.1% · Real Estate Debt / Mortgage Funds
GP Commit
0.0%
median 0.0% +0.0%
Min Investment
$100
ticket size
Offering Size
$75M
target raise
Cascade · Distributions

Where each dollar goes

$875K
LP $863K · Fees $13K · GP $0
GROSS PROCEEDS$875KGPFFees to Manager$12,500 · 1.4% of grossLPT1Return of Capital$500,000 · 57.1% of grossLPGPT4Residual Split (100% / 0%) · 41.4%Limited Partners · $363KGeneral Partner · $0pool fully distributed
Standard scenario · $500K equity · 5y hold · 1.75× exitRun your own cascade →

Deal diligence10 findings · worst high

Automated checks across the fund's extracted PPM. Every finding is shown with the evidence it's based on — proven numbers or a verbatim quote and page.

Document quality

Drafting defects found in the PPM prose — numeric inconsistencies, broken cross-references, unfilled placeholders, and defined-term problems. Each is shown with the offending quote and its page.

Numeric inconsistency — Organization and Offering Expenses ($105,000 vs $150,000)

High

The Estimated Use of Proceeds table lists Organization and Offering Expenses as $105,000 (yielding Net Proceeds of $74,895,000), but the table's own footnote (2) and the Summary fee table describe those same expenses as $5,000 of organizational costs plus up to $145,000 of legal fees ($150,000 total) — the $105,000 figure understates expenses by $45,000 and overstates net proceeds.

Organization and Offering Expenses(2)(3) $ 105,000 Net Proceeds from this Offering $ 74,895,000 ... We will reimburse our Manager for organization and offering costs, which include expected organizational costs of approximately $5,000 and up to $145,000 of legal fees incurred in preparing this offering.
PPM p.6993% confidence

Numeric inconsistency — Company telephone number

Low

The Company's principal telephone number is stated as (404) 850-9225 on the cover and in the Summary, but as (404) 850-9223 in the Terms of the Offering section — the same contact number is recorded two different ways.

our phone number is (404) 850-9225. ... Our telephone number is (404) 850-9223.
PPM p.390% confidence

Diligence gaps

Questions a standard diligence questionnaire would ask that the PPM leaves unanswered.

DDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ readiness

How much of a standard institutional due-diligence questionnaire this fund's offering documents answer out of the box. Gaps are questions an allocator will ask directly.

38%
Coverage
5 answered0 partial8 gaps13 questions
Economics
  • What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?Gap
  • What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?Gap
  • Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?Gap
  • Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?Gap
  • What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?Gap
Structure
  • What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?Gap
  • What is the fund's investment strategy / asset class?UnknownAnswered
  • What is the fund's vintage year?Vintage 2015.Answered
  • What is the target offering size?Target offering of $75,000,000.Answered
  • What is the minimum LP investment?Minimum investment of $100.Answered
Fees & Expenses
  • Is the fund's fee schedule disclosed (management fee, etc.)?4 fee line item(s) extracted from the offering documents.Answered
Governance
  • Does the fund engage an independent auditor?Gap
  • Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?Gap

Fee scheduletaken before LP distributions

Total load 0.50%
Fee
Trigger
Basis
Rate
Each investor distribution
0.5% of every investor distribution
0.50%
Organization and Offering Expense Reimbursement
Ongoing during offering period; Manager pays upfront and is reimbursed in monthly installments
Up to $150,000 flat (approximately $5,000 organizational costs + up to $145,000 legal fees); monthly reimbursement capped at 0.50% of aggregate gross offering proceeds
0.00%
Special Servicing Expenses
Non-performing asset / default event
Variable; actual expenses incurred for non-performing asset workouts including foreclosure counsel, titling, property maintenance, REO marketing and sale
0.00%
Loan Origination Fee
Loan origination
Paid by Borrowers to Sponsor/affiliates (not by the Company or shareholders); amount not specified in document
0.00%

Service providers3 gaps

Legal Counsel
Gap
Not disclosed
No independent counsel named for investors. Common in small syndications where Manager and Fund share counsel — reduces independence. Verify during diligence.
Auditor
Gap
Not disclosed
Audit intent not stated in PPM. Ask the sponsor: will the fund be audited, by whom, and on what frequency?
Fund Administrator
Gap
Not disclosed
No third-party fund administrator referenced. Manager likely handles admin internally — common for <$10M raises but reduces independence.
Placement Agent
OK
No placement agent engaged
No placement agent engaged. Direct placement by Manager — no placement fees eat your invested capital.

Community threads0 active

What allocators are saying. Diligence notes, open questions, attached scenarios.

No threads yet. Be the first →

Reviews

No reviews yet

Be the first allocator to leave a take.

Funds you might also likesame Unknown