Default
Score model

Pick how composites are weighted for you. Affects every score across the app.

Sign in to save models →
Sign in

ERC Communities 1, Inc.

Sponsored by ERC Communities·

Unknown· Debt· Inc · 3 classes· ● Low· PPM v1· Updated 26d ago
3 data notes
Unusual structureLow-confidence extractionUnscored: absolute lp take
Run the numbers
Composite
20.0
median 45 25
Pref Return
median 9.0% · Multifamily / Apartments
LP Take (Base)
median 82.1% · Multifamily / Apartments
GP Commit
0.0%
median 0.0% +0.0%
Min Investment
$100
ticket size
Offering Size
$50M
target raise
Cascade · Distributions

Where each dollar goes

$875K
LP $800K · Fees $75K · GP $0
GROSS PROCEEDS$875KGPFFees to Manager$75,000 · 8.6% of grossLPT1Return of Capital$500,000 · 57.1% of grossLPGPT4Residual Split (100% / 0%) · 34.3%Limited Partners · $300KGeneral Partner · $0pool fully distributed
Standard scenario · $500K equity · 5y hold · 1.75× exitRun your own cascade →
Class structure · 3 classes

How ERC Communities 1, Inc. divides the cap table

The cascade above models the blended LP view. Click a class below to view per-class economics.

Deal diligence16 findings · worst high

Automated checks across the fund's extracted PPM. Every finding is shown with the evidence it's based on — proven numbers or a verbatim quote and page.

Document quality

Drafting defects found in the PPM prose — numeric inconsistencies, broken cross-references, unfilled placeholders, and defined-term problems. Each is shown with the offending quote and its page.

Numeric inconsistency — Class A Preferred shares outstanding at December 31, 2022

High

Preferred shares outstanding at Dec 31, 2022 are stated as 177,584 in Note 1 but 90,672 on the balance sheet and in Note 5.

As of December 31, 2022 preferred shareholders owned 177,584 convertible preferred shares [...] Preferred stock, Class A: 8,333,333 shares authorized, 90,672 and 64,318 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
PPM p.4688% confidence

Numeric inconsistency — Class A Preferred Stock dividend rate

High

Preferred dividend rate is stated as 10% per annum in the body but as 8 percent in the financial-statement equity notes.

cumulative dividends which accrue on a daily basis in arrears at the rate of 10% per year [...] Class A preferred stockholders are entitled to a single vote per share and to an 8 percent annual dividend
PPM p.1590% confidence

Document-quality defect — Auditor's report audit-period statement

Medium

Auditor's report audits the balance sheet as of Dec 31, 2022 and 2021 but states the related statements cover the calendar year periods ended 2021 and 2020.

which comprise the balance sheet as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the related statements of loss and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the calendar year periods ended 2021 and 2020
PPM p.4380% confidence

Numeric inconsistency — Class A Common Stock outstanding after the offering

Medium

Shares outstanding after the offering (2,608,968) cannot be reconciled with 131,898 outstanding before plus the up-to-5,000,000 shares offered.

Class A Stock Common outstanding before the offering 131,898 shares of Class A Common Stock. [...] Class A Common Stock outstanding after the offering 2,608,968 shares of Class A Common Stock
PPM p.462% confidence

Unfilled placeholder text — [__________], 2023

Medium

Unfilled bracketed placeholder for the sales commencement date shipped in the offering circular.

Sales of these securities will commence on [__________], 2023.
PPM p.392% confidence

Numeric inconsistency — Date of name change to ERC Communities 1, Inc.

Low

Same name-change event is dated December 3, 2020 in the Summary but December 3, 2021 in The Company's Business section.

subsequently changed its name to ERC Communities 1, Inc. on December 3, 2020. ERC 1 is a subsidiary [...] subsequently changed its name to ERC Communities 1, Inc. on December 3, 2021. ERC Communities 1 is a subsidiary
PPM p.393% confidence

Numeric inconsistency — ERC Zephyrhills 2 intended unit count

Low

Zephyrhills 2 is described as a 60-unit site in prose but listed as 58 units in the statistics table and elsewhere as 58-lot/58 unit.

a 60-unit site adjacent to the existing site ('ERC Zephyrhills 2') was acquired in September 2022 [...] Intended Number of Units on the Property 60 58 65
PPM p.382% confidence

Spelling / typo — Forum selection clause (Securities Being Offered)

Low

Broken sentence in the forum-selection clause omits the state name: 'the Court of Chancery in the State of or alternatively...'.

provides that the Court of Chancery in the State of or alternatively if that is not enforceable competent federal courts in the State of Delaware are the exclusive forums
PPM p.4280% confidence

Diligence gaps

Questions a standard diligence questionnaire would ask that the PPM leaves unanswered.

DDQ gap: Does the fund engage an independent auditor?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?

High

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Governance). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Structure). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ gap: What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?

Medium

The offering documents don't answer a standard institutional DDQ question (Economics). An allocator will ask this directly — the GP should be ready with an answer.

90% confidence

DDQ readiness

How much of a standard institutional due-diligence questionnaire this fund's offering documents answer out of the box. Gaps are questions an allocator will ask directly.

38%
Coverage
5 answered0 partial8 gaps13 questions
Economics
  • What is the preferred return (hurdle) rate offered to LPs?Gap
  • What is the LP/GP carried-interest split above the preferred return?Gap
  • Is there a GP catch-up, and at what rate?Gap
  • Does the fund have a GP clawback provision?Gap
  • What is the GP's capital commitment (skin in the game)?Gap
Structure
  • What distribution-waterfall structure does the fund use?Gap
  • What is the fund's investment strategy / asset class?Debt · UnknownAnswered
  • What is the fund's vintage year?Vintage 2018.Answered
  • What is the target offering size?Target offering of $50,000,000.Answered
  • What is the minimum LP investment?Minimum investment of $100.Answered
Fees & Expenses
  • Is the fund's fee schedule disclosed (management fee, etc.)?4 fee line item(s) extracted from the offering documents.Answered
Governance
  • Does the fund engage an independent auditor?Gap
  • Does the fund use a third-party fund administrator?Gap

Fee scheduletaken before LP distributions

Total load 9.50%
Fee
Trigger
Basis
Rate
Broker Cash Commission
Upon closing of subscriptions
Percentage of amount raised in the Offering
6.50%
Monthly, ongoing; fee has been waived for all years to date (2021, 2022, 2023)
Monthly fee of 3.0% of 'assets under development' (total costs of land, development and entitlement costs, all construction costs, and contractor fees)
3.00%
Technology Services Fee
Pre-offering and during offering
Flat fees: $5,000 advance against accountable expenses + up to $6,000 pre-offering account management ($2,000/month) + $2,000/month post-commencement not to exceed $18,000; maximum $29,000 total
0.00%
Transfer Agent Fee
Annual / secondary market activity
Approximately $30,000 annually; no set-up costs; fees limited to secondary market activity
0.00%

Service providers3 gaps

Legal Counsel
Gap
Not disclosed
No independent counsel named for investors. Common in small syndications where Manager and Fund share counsel — reduces independence. Verify during diligence.
Auditor
Gap
Not disclosed
Audit intent not stated in PPM. Ask the sponsor: will the fund be audited, by whom, and on what frequency?
Fund Administrator
Gap
Not disclosed
No third-party fund administrator referenced. Manager likely handles admin internally — common for <$10M raises but reduces independence.
Placement Agent
OK
No placement agent engaged
No placement agent engaged. Direct placement by Manager — no placement fees eat your invested capital.

Community threads0 active

What allocators are saying. Diligence notes, open questions, attached scenarios.

No threads yet. Be the first →

Reviews

No reviews yet

Be the first allocator to leave a take.

Funds you might also likesame Unknown